PETALUMA CIVIC
Get NotifiedSign In
The Pulse
Meetings & Decisions
MeetingsCity Council & VotesProject Tracker
Budget & Finances
OverviewExplore Data
Permits
Explore Records
Search & RecordsDeep Dives
Planning Commission

Planning Commission

Tue, February 13, 2024

Agenda PDFMinutes PDFWatch Video
Agenda items
Vote records
Discussion summary
Transcript
Meeting summaryAI-generated

Planning Commission — February 13, 2024


This was a special meeting of the Petaluma Planning Commission, with all seven commissioners present. The session ran nearly five hours, largely devoted to an early design study session for a significant mixed-use development proposal along the Petaluma riverfront.


Approval of Minutes — January 23, 2024


The Commission approved the minutes from its previous meeting without amendment.


Vote: Carried 7–0 (Racusen, Hooper, Cader Thompson, Bauer, McErlane, Mozes, Whisman all in favor)


Study Session: Oyster Cove Mixed-Use Neighborhood Project


This agenda item was a non-binding study session — no formal approval or discretionary action was taken — designed to give the project team early feedback from commissioners on design direction before a full Site Plan and Architectural Review is submitted. The project is located at 100 E. D Street, 0 E. D Street, and 0 Copeland Street, on parcels near the Petaluma River.


Planning Manager Andrew Trippel introduced the item, followed by a presentation from the applicant team: Keith McCoy, Mandi Misasi, David Burton, and Anaca Carpenter. Commissioners questioned the applicant team at length, with every commissioner participating — topics covered by the minutes include architectural style, bulk, height, color, and landscaping, though the minutes do not record the specific substance of individual commissioner questions or comments.


Public Comment drew both in-person and written input from six members of the public:

*In person:* Nicola L. Frye, Veronica Olsen, Nicholas Harris, and Dave Alden (who also spoke during general public comment at the meeting's opening)
*Written/emailed:* Eric Leland, Mary Reddick, and Stephanie Bastianon

The minutes do not summarize the content of individual public comments, so the specific concerns or support expressed cannot be reported here.


Following a five-minute break, commissioners provided final non-binding feedback to staff and the applicant team. Because this was a study session, no CEQA determination was required and no vote was taken on project merits. The commission did vote unanimously to extend the meeting past 11:00 p.m. in order to complete discussion.


Vote to extend meeting past 11 p.m.: Carried 7–0; moved by Chair Hooper, seconded by Commissioner McErlane.


The session concluded with brief commissioner and staff comments before adjournment at 11:06 p.m.


Key Takeaways


Oyster Cove is an early-stage project: This study session was purely advisory — no approvals were granted. The feedback commissioners provided will help shape the formal design submission that will come back for binding review later.
The meeting drew meaningful public interest: Six community members submitted comments on the Oyster Cove project either in person or in writing, suggesting the development is on residents' radar.
A long meeting: The commission sat for over five hours and had to vote to extend past 11 p.m., signaling the depth of discussion around this project's design.
No dissent on procedural votes: Both the minutes approval and the meeting extension passed unanimously 7–0 with full attendance.
Next steps unclear from minutes: The minutes do not capture the specific design direction or concerns raised by commissioners, so residents interested in the details of feedback given to the Oyster Cove applicant team should consult staff reports or recordings when available.

AI-generated summary from voice-to-text transcript. Not the official record. Verify important details with the source documents linked above.

Agenda items (2)

Procedural (1)
1ProceduralApproval of Minutes for the meeting of January 23, 2024.
Public Hearing
2Public HearingRecommendation to conduct a study session to solicit input and provide non­binding comments concerning architectural style, bulk, height, and color of proposed structures, landscaping, and other details, as needed to inform design development for required Site Plan and Architectural Review of the Oyster Cove Mixed Use Neighborhood Project located at 100 E. D, 0 E. D, and 0 Copeland Streets; APNs 007­700­006, 007­700­003, 007­700­005; City Record No. PLPR­2024­0001 (PLPJ­2022­0005). No discretionary action is requested during this study session; therefore, no CEQA determination is required at this time.

Additional votes recorded in minutes

Approval of Minutes for January 23, 2024

aye 7
Blake Hooperaye
Darren Racusenaye
Heidi Baueraye
Janice Cader Thompsonaye
Jessica Mozesaye
Rick Whismanaye
Roger McErlaneaye

Continue meeting past 11 PM

aye 7
Blake Hooperaye
Darren Racusenaye
Heidi Baueraye
Janice Cader Thompsonaye
Jessica Mozesaye
Rick Whismanaye
Roger McErlaneaye

Verbatim transcript available

3 transcript segments indexed

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chamber 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 MINUTES Tuesday, February 13, 2024 CALL TO ORDER - (6:00 PM) ROLL CALL PRESENT: Darren Racusen, Blake Hooper, Janice Cader Thompson, Jessica Mozes, Heidi Bauer, Roger McErlane, Rick Whisman ABSENT: None GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT - (6:01 PM) During General Public Comment, the public is invited to make comments on items of public interest that are within the Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction and that are not listed on the current agenda. Public comments are limited to up to three minutes per person. Depending on the number of persons wishing to address the Commission, time will be allocated in equal shares totaling no more than twenty minutes, subject to the Commission’s discretion (Cal. Gov’t. Code §54954.3(a), Petaluma City Council Rules, Policies and Procedures, III). Chair Hooper opened general public comment. - Dave Alden Chair Hooper closed general public comment. Chair Hooper closed the Meeting Item and continued with the agenda. PRESENTATIONS - (6:03 PM) Chair Hooper announced that there were no presentations during this meeting. Chair Hooper closed the Meeting Item and continued with the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - (6:04 PM) 1. Chair Hooper announced Meeting Item 1 – Approval of Minutes for the meeting of January 23, 2024. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 1. Chair Hooper invited the Commissioners to provide amendments. No amendments were provided. A roll call vote was taken:
Vote: Carried 7-0 Yes: Racusen, Chair Hooper, Cader Thompson, Bauer, McErlane, Mozes, Whisman No: None Absent: None Abstained: None Chair Hooper announced that the motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Chair Hooper closed Meeting Item 1 and continued with the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION - (6:03 PM) 2. Chair Hooper announced Meeting Item 2 – Study Session – Recommendation to conduct a study session to solicit input and provide non-binding comments concerning architectural style, bulk, height, and color of proposed structures, landscaping, and other details, as needed to inform design development for required Site Plan and Architectural Review of the Oyster Cove Mixed Use Neighborhood Project located at 100 E. D, 0 E. D, and 0 Copeland Streets; APNs 007-700-006, 007-700-003, 007-700-005; City Record No. PLPR-2024-0001 (PLPJ-2022-0005). No discretionary action is requested during this study session; therefore, no CEQA determination is required at this time. Chair Hooper announced this was not a public hearing and did not require any disclosure of Ex- Parte communications. Planning Manager Andrew Trippel presented on Meeting Item 2. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 2 for staff questions. - Commissioner McErlane - Commissioner Racusen Applicants (Keith McCoy, Mandi Misasi, David Burton, and Anaca Carpenter) presented on Meeting Item 2. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 2 for applicant team questions. - Chair Hooper - Commissioner Mozes - Commissioner McErlane - Commissioner Bauer - Commissioner Racusen - Commissioner Whisman - Vice Mayor Cader Thompson Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 2 for public comment. In Person: - Nicola L. Frye - Veronica Olsen
- Nicholas Harris - Dave Alden Emailed: - Eric Leland - Mary Reddick - Stephanie Bastianon Chair Hooper closed public comments. A five-minute break was taken. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 2 to Commissioner discussion. Chair Hooper requested a motion to vote to continue the meeting past 11 pm. Chair Hooper motioned for a vote, and Commissioner McErlane seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken: Vote: Carried 7-0 Yes: Racusen, Chair Hooper, Cader Thompson, Mozes, Bauer, McErlane, Whisman No: None Absent: None Abstained: None Chair Hooper announced that the motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Chair Hooper returned to Meeting Item 2 Commissioner discussion. Chair Hooper called on the Commission to provide final comments to staff. Chair Hooper closed Meeting Item 2 and continued with the agenda. COMMISSION COMMENT - (10:59 PM) Vice Mayor Cader Thompson Commissioner Racusen Commissioner McErlane STAFF COMMENT – (11:01 PM) Andrew Trippel, Planning Manager ADJOURNMENT Chair Hooper adjourned the meeting at 11:06 p.m.