City Council
Mon, April 14, 2025
City Council Special Meeting — April 14, 2025
This was a special session of the Petaluma City Council focused entirely on a General Plan update workshop. All seven councilmembers were present. The meeting ran nearly six hours, ultimately extending past 11:00 p.m. before adjourning just before midnight, with portions of the agenda carried over to a future meeting.
General Plan Update: Areas of Change, Land Use Designations, and Alternatives
This workshop continued the Council's ongoing work to shape Petaluma's Draft General Plan, specifically to gather Council feedback that will guide staff in developing a preferred land use map for the city. Special Projects Manager Heather Hines led the presentation, which was divided into five segments — each covering a distinct geographic area or land use topic — with public comment invited after each segment.
Segment 1 — Maker/Microbusiness Designation; Upstream and Downstream River-Adjacent Areas; River Park Area
Two members of the public spoke: Richard Thompson and Mary Dooley. The minutes do not detail the specific content of their remarks or the Council's subsequent discussion. These topics relate to how land along the Petaluma River corridor and areas suited to small-scale manufacturing and maker spaces should be designated in the new General Plan.
Segment 2 — Downtown Area; Station Area Mixed Use Designation; Downtown SMART Station Area
Three people spoke: Ali Gaylord, Darren Racusen, and Jill Lowrey. Again, specific comment content is not captured in the minutes. Council discussion followed. These topics are significant because they address how the city will plan for density, mixed uses, and transit-oriented development around the downtown core and the existing SMART rail station — areas with considerable development potential.
Segment 3 — East Washington Corridor; Petaluma Boulevard North Corridor; Petaluma Boulevard South Corridor
One person, Lehua Stuart, spoke during this segment. The three corridors discussed represent major commercial and transitional zones in the city where land use changes could have significant neighborhood impacts. Council discussion continued after public comment.
Segments 4 and 5 — Continued to a Future Meeting
Because discussion ran long, the Council voted 7-0 to extend the meeting past 11:00 p.m. (moved by Councilmember Cader Thompson, seconded by Vice Mayor Nau), but the remaining two segments of the presentation were ultimately not completed and will be taken up at a future meeting.
Vote to extend meeting past 11:00 p.m.: Carried 7–0. Yes: Barnacle, Cader Thompson, DeCarli, Nau, Quint, Shribbs, McDonnell. No: None.
*Note: As a workshop, this session produced no binding decisions. Its purpose was to give staff direction from the Council to inform the preferred land use map. The minutes do not record the specific guidance or direction the Council gave on any individual topic.*
Key Takeaways
AI-generated summary from voice-to-text transcript. Not the official record. Verify important details with the source documents linked above.
Agenda items (1)
Additional votes recorded in minutes
Motion to Continue Meeting Past 11:00 p.m.
Verbatim transcript available
2 transcript segments indexed