PETALUMA CIVIC
Meetings & Decisions
Budget & Finances
Explore Records
Planning Commission

Planning Commission

Tue, June 25, 2024

Agenda items
Vote records
Discussion summary
Transcript
Meeting summaryAI-generated

Planning Commission — June 25, 2024


This was a regular meeting of the Petaluma Planning Commission, notable for a lengthy evening session that ran nearly five hours. All five commissioners were present: Chair Blake Hooper, Janice Cader Thompson, Jessica Mozes, Roger McErlane, and Darren Racusen.



Approval of Minutes — June 11, 2024


The Commission approved the minutes from its prior meeting without amendment. (Note: Chair Hooper verbally announced the vote as 4-0, but the roll call recorded five affirmative votes; the 5-0 roll call result is the accurate count.)


Vote: Carried 5-0 (Mozes, Hooper, Cader Thompson, McErlane, Racusen — all yes)



Scott Ranch Residential Project — Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR)


Senior Planner Mike Janusek presented this item, followed by a presentation from the applicant. The project proposes the construction of 28 single-family homes and associated site improvements at 1860 D Street (APNs 019-120-040 & 019-120-041). The project's environmental impacts were previously analyzed in a full Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council on February 27, 2023, so tonight's review focused on site plan and architectural design rather than environmental re-analysis.


All five commissioners asked questions of staff before public comment was opened. Six members of the public spoke or submitted written comments on the project. Written comments were received from Peter Cohn, Susan Kirks, Nickola Frye, and Veronica Olsen. In-person speakers included Nickola Frye, Jared Emerson-Johnson, Greg Colvin, Karen Bergin, Carol Eber, and Frank Griffo. The minutes do not detail the substance of those comments, but the range of speakers — including several who also engaged on the General Plan later in the evening — suggests ongoing community interest in development in this part of the city.


Following public comment, the Commission deliberated and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the SPAR.


Vote: Carried 5-0 (Mozes moved, McErlane seconded; Mozes, Cader Thompson, Hooper, McErlane, and Racusen — all yes)



General Plan Update Study Session — Transportation, Parks, and Arts, Culture & Creativity Policy Frameworks


This was a non-binding study session; no formal action was taken. The purpose was to gather commissioner input on three draft policy frameworks being developed as part of Petaluma's ongoing General Plan Update. These frameworks will inform the eventual Land Use Framework and, ultimately, a full Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update.


Arts, Culture, and Creativity Framework: Consultants Ron Whitmore and David Plettner-Saunders of Raimi and Associates presented this framework. Commissioners Racusen, Cader Thompson, McErlane, and Hooper asked questions. One member of the public, Nickola Frye, spoke in person; no written comments were received on this section.


Transportation Policy Framework: Kelly Bond, a Senior Planner with Fehr & Peers, presented this framework. Commissioner Mozes and Chair Hooper, who serve on an ad hoc committee for the General Plan Update, also shared committee-level comments on transportation and parks topics.


Parks and Recreation Policy Framework: Megan McNulty, Senior Planner at Raimi and Associates, presented this framework. Again, Nickola Frye was the sole in-person public commenter, and no written comments were received.


Commissioners engaged in questions and discussion across all three frameworks. The session ran until nearly 11:00 PM, reflecting the depth of material covered. Because this was a study session, the commission's comments are advisory and nonbinding, feeding back to staff and consultants as they continue developing the General Plan Update.


Vote: No vote taken (study session only)



Key Takeaways


Scott Ranch SPAR approved 5-0: The Commission unanimously recommended approval of site plan and architectural review for 28 new single-family homes at 1860 D Street, moving the long-running Scott Ranch project closer to construction. The project's environmental review was completed in 2023.
General Plan Update is advancing: Three major policy frameworks — Transportation, Parks, and Arts/Culture/Creativity — are now in draft form and were reviewed by commissioners, who provided nonbinding feedback to guide the next phase of the update process.
Ad hoc committee active: Commissioners Mozes and Hooper are serving on a General Plan Update ad hoc committee and presented substantive comments, signaling active commission engagement in shaping Petaluma's long-range planning document.
Community engagement ongoing: Multiple residents, particularly Nickola Frye, participated in comments across multiple agenda items, reflecting continued public interest in both the Scott Ranch development and the General Plan process.
Long meeting: The session ran from 6:03 PM to 10:57 PM — nearly five hours — underscoring the significance and complexity of the items before the Commission.

AI-generated summary from voice-to-text transcript. Not the official record. Verify important details with the source documents linked above.

Agenda items (3)

Procedural (1)
1ProceduralApproval of Minutes for the meeting of June 11, 2024
Public Hearing
2Public HearingPublic Hearing – Recommendation to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission to Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider a Recommendation to Approve Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR) for the Scott Ranch Residential Project, Consisting of the Development of 28 Single­Family Residential Homes and Associated Site Improvements, Located at 1860 D Street; APNs 019­120­040 & 019­120­041; City Record No. PLSR­ 2023­0015. The project was fully analyzed in the Scott Ranch Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2004072137), certified by the City Council on February 27, 2023, and is subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program therein. THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MEETING ITEM WERE PUBLISHED ON THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2024.
3Public HearingStudy Session – Recommendation to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission to Receive Staff and Ad Hoc Committee Presentations and Conduct a Study Session to Solicit Input and Provide Nonbinding Comments to General Plan Update Staff and Consultants for Draft Transportation, Parks, and Arts, Culture, and Creativity Policy Frameworks as Part of the Foundational Work on the General Plan Update. No action is being taken; therefore, a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) determination is not required. Following review of the draft Policy Frameworks and development of the draft Land Use Framework, the General Plan Update project will begin preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project. THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MEETING ITEM WERE PUBLISHED ON THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2024.

Additional votes recorded in minutes

Approval of Minutes for June 11, 2024

aye 5
Blake Hooperaye
Darren Racusenaye
Janice Cader Thompsonaye
Jessica Mozesaye
Roger McErlaneaye

Approve SPAR for Scott Ranch Residential Project at 1860 D Street

aye 5
Blake Hooperaye
Darren Racusenaye
Janice Cader Thompsonaye
Jessica Mozesaye
Roger McErlaneaye

Verbatim transcript available

4 transcript segments indexed

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chamber 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 MINUTES Tuesday, June 25, 2024 CALL TO ORDER – (6:03 PM) ROLL CALL PRESENT: Blake Hooper, Darren Racusen, Janice Cader Thompson, Jessica Mozes, and Roger McErlane ABSENT: None GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT – (6:04 PM) During General Public Comment, the public is invited to make comments on items of public interest that are within the Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction and that are not listed on the current agenda. Public comments are limited to up to three minutes per person. Depending on the number of persons wishing to address the Commission, time will be allocated in equal shares totaling no more than twenty minutes, subject to the Commission’s discretion (Cal. Gov’t. Code §54954.3(a), Petaluma City Council Rules, Policies and Procedures, III). Chair Hooper opened general public comment. Chair Hooper closed general public comment. Chair Hooper closed the Meeting Item and continued with the agenda. PRESENTATIONS – (6:05 PM) Chair Hooper announced there were no presentations during this meeting. Chair Hooper closed the Meeting Item and continued with the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – (6:05 PM) 1. Meeting Item 1 – Approval of Minutes for the meeting of June 11, 2024. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 1. Chair Hooper invited the Commissioners to provide amendments. No amendments were provided. Chair Hooper requested a roll call vote. A roll call vote was taken: Vote: Carried 5-0
Yes: Mozes, Chair Hooper, Cader Thompson, McErlane, and Racusen No: None Absent: None Abstained: None Chair Hooper announced that the minutes were approved by a vote of 4-0. Chair Hooper closed Meeting Item 1 and continued with the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION – (6:06 PM) 2. Public Hearing – Recommendation to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission to Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider a Recommendation to Approve Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR) for the Scott Ranch Residential Project, Consisting of the Development of 28 Single-Family Residential Homes and Associated Site Improvements, Located at 1860 D Street; APNs 019-120-040 & 019-120-041; City Record No. PLSR-2023-0015. The project was fully analyzed in the Scott Ranch Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2004072137), certified by the City Council on February 27, 2023, and is subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program therein. THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MEETING ITEM WERE PUBLISHED ON THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2024. Chair Hooper introduced Meeting Item 2. Chair Hooper announced this item was a public hearing and disclosure of ex-parte and communications is required. No ex-parte communication disclosures were made. Senior Planner Mike Janusek presented on Meeting Item 2. The applicant, Scott Ranch, presented on Meeting Item 2. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 2 to questions for staff. Council Member Cader Thompson Commissioner Racusen Chair Hooper Commissioner McErlane Commissioner Mozes Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 2 to public comments: Emailed: - Peter Cohn - Susan Kirks - Nickola Frye - Veronica Olsen In Person:
- Nickola Frye - Jared Emerson-Johnson - Greg Colvin - Karen Bergin - Carol Eber - Frank Griffo Chair Hooper closed public comment. Chair Hooper brought the item back to the Commission for discussion. Chair Hooper requested a motion to vote on Meeting Item 2. Commissioner Mozes motioned for a vote, and Commissioner McErlane seconded the motion. Chair Hooper requested a roll call vote. A roll call vote was taken: Vote: Carried 5-0 Yes: Mozes, Cader Thompson, Chair Hooper, McErlane, and Racusen No: None Absent: None Abstained: None Chair Hooper announced that the motion carried by a vote of 5-0. Chair Hooper closed Meeting Item 2 and continued with the agenda. A short break was taken. 3. Study Session – Recommendation to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission to Receive Staff and Ad Hoc Committee Presentations and Conduct a Study Session to Solicit Input and Provide Nonbinding Comments to General Plan Update Staff and Consultants for Draft Transportation, Parks, and Arts, Culture, and Creativity Policy Frameworks as Part of the Foundational Work on the General Plan Update. No action is being taken; therefore, a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) determination is not required. Following review of the draft Policy Frameworks and development of the draft Land Use Framework, the General Plan Update project will begin preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project. THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MEETING ITEM WERE PUBLISHED ON THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2024. Chair Hooper opened Meeting Item 3. Special Projects Manager Heather Hines presented on Meeting Item 3. Raimi and Associates Ron Whitmore and David Plettner-Saunders presented on the Arts, Culture and Creativity Framework. Chair Hooper opened the Arts, Culture and Creativity Framework to questions for staff. Commissioner Racusen Council Member Cader Thompson
Commissioner McErlane Chair Hooper Chair Hooper opened the Arts, Culture and Creativity Framework to public comment: Emailed: - None In Person: - Nickola Frye Chair Hooper closed public comment. Chair Hooper brought the item back to the Commission for discussion. Fehr & Peers Senior Planner, Kelly Bond, presented on Transportation Policy Framework Raimi and Associates Senior Planner Megan McNulty presented on the Parks and Recreation Policy Framework Commissioner Mozes and Chair Hooper presented ad hoc committee comments on Transportation and Parks and Recreation Policy Frameworks. Chair Hooper opened Transportation and Parks and Recreation Policy Frameworks to questions for staff. - Commissioner Racusen - Council Member Cader Thompson - Commission McErlane - Chair Hooper Chair Hooper opened Transportation and Parks and Recreation Policy Frameworks to public comments: Emailed: - None In Person: - Nickola Frye Chair Hooper closed public comment. Chair Hooper brought the item back to the Commission for discussion. Chair Hooper closed Meeting Item 3 and continued with the agenda. COMMISSION COMMENT – (10:52 PM) Council Member Cader Thompson Commissioner Racusen Chair Hooper Commissioner McErlane Commissioner Mozes STAFF COMMENT – (10:54 PM) Planning Manager, Andrew Trippel ADJOURNMENT Chair Hooper adjourned the meeting at 10:57 p.m.